Risk Identification, Assessment, and Measurement
Determine the overall adequacy of the credit union’s risk identification, assessment, and measuring functions.
Prerequisites
-
Determine the risk governance framework
People to Interview
-
Leadership involved in policymaking
-
Head(s) of Risk Management and/or Internal Audit Departments, if applicable
-
Audit Committee Chairperson, if applicable
-
Supervisory Committee Chairperson, if applicable
-
Board of Directors, if warranted
Documents to Review
-
Risk management policies and procedures
-
Risk register
-
Risk assessment
-
Risk oversight committee minutes
-
Relevant MIS
-
Strategic Plan
Questions to Consider
-
Are the risk management practices sufficient to evaluate material risks across the enterprise and capture comprehensive risk on an ongoing basis?
-
Does the credit union maintain and catalog risks in a risk register? Does the register assign risk rankings? If so, is the risk ranking method applied reasonable and executable?
-
Is a process in place for determining materiality in the context of material risk identification for the purposes of strategic planning and policymaking?
-
Are the board of director risk appetite statements and/or risk tolerances consistent with strategic plans and the credit union’s financial condition?
-
Are the risk assessment and ranking practices aligned with the board of director's risk appetite and/or risk tolerances?
-
Are risk appetites and/or tolerances further distilled into usable risk limits? Is this information used to set limits in operational and financial management policies to manage risk?
-
Are the credit union's MIS capable of identifying, aggregating, and reporting on relevant and reliable drivers of risk for purposes of forming policies and strategies, and monitoring compliance with board-approved risk tolerances? Is data quality commensurate with the size and complexity of the credit union’s operations?
Last updated on August 23, 2022.